Why this works:They hook you with a jarring claim that flips expectations.
“Picks up five times more women than a Lamborghini.” No one thinks a boxy Daihatsu van can outshine a Lamborghini in the “babe magnet” category. That disbelief
demands a second look.
This is classic “category flipping”:
- Take the least sexy thing (a van)
- Compare it to the most sexy thing (a Lambo)
- Win the comparison on a totally different dimension (seating capacity = literal “pick-up” power)
Wordplay : "Picks up women" as in dating VS "Picks up" in terms of physical transport
The subhead plays into the ridiculousness:
“Don’t laugh.”They know this is a silly proposition - and they lean into it. That makes it charming, not try-hard.
Price Anchoring: “£167,503 change from a Lamborghini.”They don’t just say it’s affordable. They say, "Here’s exactly how much money you’ll have left over if you don’t buy a supercar." That’s an ultra-specific way of framing
value through exaggeration.
The image reinforces the joke. You’ve got this dorky-looking guy surrounded by women
clearly having fun in the back of a dinky van. It’s so over-the-top it becomes
believable in its own absurd universe.
It takes the trope of cars as status symbols for attracting women and reinterprets it through a
dad-joke lens. It's saying: "You want women? Forget flash. Go for function."
It’s ironically aspirational.
Because it doesn’t try to be.